pct_logolargebg.jpg

Protecting Access
Home
Advertising
Donate Now!
Upcoming Events
Protecting Access
Past Events
About Us
History
Activities
Calendar
Program Schedule/VOD
Become a Member
Facilities
Contact Us

LEARN TO PROTECT COMMUNITY TELEVISION

THIS PAGE CONTAINS...
 important information on the state of Community TV. We exist primarily to give local residents Public Access to the media. It is therefore vitally important that we inform you about threats to our existence and how collectively we can improve and enhance these vital resources for our community. 

OTHER SITES:
 
 
 
 
 

WHY SHOULD YOU HELP PCT?
 
The P.E.G. Revolution
 

By Martin Anaya  

 

PCT is, of course, the oldest Community TV station in the US. As such, we have been on the forefront of education about P.E.G., actually even setting many of the precedents which help to define  P.E.G stations. So, what is Peg?  

 

PEG is short for Public, Education and Government programming. This means that we either produce or facilitate programs in the public interest which fall into one of these three categories. It’s a very important mission but perhaps a bit dry for today's media landscape. So how do we describe the value of PEG? Well, let’s look at another example. 

 

The cable industry likes to pat itself on the back for creating and funding C-SPAN, the national cable channel that brings gavel to-gavel coverage of the senate and US House of representatives proceedings. This is advertised as "Public Access to the political process" and is seen as an alternative, indeed a "revolutionary" alternative to the world of entertainment driven television.

 

According to authors Stephan Frantzich and John Sullivan, in their book, "The C-Span Revolution", the Cable created network has "revolutionized" TV from a method of entertainment delivery to a method of unfiltered information delivery. They even call this transformation a "radical" idea.

  

Of course, it wasn't always this way. Long ago, the Federal Communications Commission was chartered to require broadcasters to operate in the "Public Interest". While it seems the standards of what is considered "Public Interest"  have become somewhat elastic over the years, the truth is that in the very early days, TV was sold to the public as a method of information delivery; a means to tie together the local culture throgh public, education and government affairs programs.  The "golden era" of TV as it is now known was punctuated with insightful news and informational programs like "Face the Nation", and Edward R Murrow's "See It Now". Even entertainment seemed educational, as in the 1957 re-creation of Orson Welles' "War of the Worlds" or programs like "Playhouse 90" and "Kraft Television Theatre".

 

 

Radio pioneer Edward R. Murrow

Edward R. Murrow

 

So perhaps C-Span is less of a radical, revolutionary idea than  a 'reversionary" idea, a reversion to the way it used to be. Still, when Brian Lamb and friends invented C-SPAN, their mission of making government more available to its citizens was actually radical for its time.  

 

But, if the Cable Companies are responsible for the national C-Span, who handles the local? After all, there are many levels of local government that should also be just as “radically” transparent right? There are many rising political stars who should be just as eager to have their views and opinions expressed. No? And certainly, there is hunger for local audiences to see and hear their local concerns being addressed. Yes? Therefore, any attribute one may ascribe to C-Span on a national level one may also ascribe to P.E.G. on the local level.

Attributes like…

 

1) Creating a more transparent democracy

2) Allowing a forum for public views and opinion about the body politic.

3) Creating Community togetherness and opportunities to engage elected leaders.

4) Creating space for local culture and art to flourish.

 

 

 The First amendment to the U.S. constitution is of course what established our right to free speech as law. It fosters open debate, better political decisions and  "social tolerance" as Professor Lee Bollinger describes it; that we all may be more accountable and civil to one another.

 

But the first amendment was adopted on December 15th 1791, long before the era of electronic communications. So what did freedom of speech look like back then? In most cases it quite literally meant that one could jump on an apple crate in the town square and speak.

 

Now, fast-forward two hundred and twenty years later and let’s ask ourselves the question again, "what is Freedom of Speech in the 21st century?" What does freedom look like in this electronic brave new world. If Video killed the radio star, then what in fact will kill video? More importantly, will we, the people be at the effect of it, or at the wheel of it?

 

Make no mistake; the big media corporations will retain pre-eminence by keeping their place on the basic cable spectrum and trying to squeeze the common man and woman out. So where is the voice for the common folk?  If we think of these companies as “developers” who use our public rights of way to build private business on  real-estate that we own, then we can look at P.E.G. as our electronic “green-space”.   

 

As the internet slowly begins to resemble TV and vice-versa, greater pressure will be placed to fsqueeze the common voice and transfer traditional cable space for more industry use. This, of course is already happening in the case of ATT's cable product,  "U-verse". And Satellite operators pay no “right-of-way’ fees to local government at all,  nor are they required to carry P.E.G. stations like PCT.

 

So what do we need? We need a revolution…a PEG revolution just like the one C-Span saw several years ago. Who now can imagine cable TV without C-Span? Must be heresy to even think it, right? Well, friends, that’s what we need in the P.E.G. world. We need a revolution, the like of which will see a sea-change in Washington that allows greater freedom of speech and allows local voices a place at the table.

 

As we go through this elections season, keep something in mind. Many in power profit when those without have no voice. But society profits greatly when all have access to freedom of speech and equality. Again, what we need is a revolution, a PEG revolution.

 

So how can you help? For starters, you can put your money where your mouth is. If you believe these resources at PCT are vital then call us today and pledge an amount, any amount. As we go, there will be other ways to help. For now, do what you can and help us grow this idea, this notion that ”Truth, Freedom and independence in TV”, as my good friend Bruce Latimer calls it, really matters.

 

 

Call and pledge today: 650-355-8001

Email us at: pacificaTV@sbcuc.net

Check us online at: www.PCT26.com

 
 
 



News and Information:
 
1-09 COMCAST UPDATE
 
As a result of the DIVCA law referenced in the article dated 8-08, Comcast has changed the way it funds Public Access. Our understanding per the terms of DIVCA is that Comcast is responsible to pay PCT an average of 1.2% of the annual gross on its video service in Pacifica. This payment is for the ongoing operations of local Public Access operations.
 
In November of 2009 the City Finance Director wrote a letter to Comcast requesting that they comply with the terms of DIVCA. We are currently awaiting official response from Comcast. Meanwhile, Comcast continues to fund PCT per the old agreement which dates back to 1992. Under those terms, PCT recieves 80 cents per subscriber and an annual equipment upgrade fund of ten thousand dollars. Curiously however, while PCT does recieve the 80 cents fee, it has recieved no equipment fund monies for 2008 or 2009.
 
PCT and the city are asking Comcast for the back due which should have begun to take effect starting in 2008.
 
 
8-08 DIVCA UPDATE
 
DIVCA is the new state law that governs Cable businesses (franchises) in California. At this time, our read of DIVCA means that any cable operator (Comcast, ATT, Verizon) within the city of Pacifica must dedicate 1.2% of its revenue to support our Community Media Center (PCT).
 
At this time, there is no known start date for ATT or Verizon to offer cable in Pacifica. ATT does offer a video product that utilizes satellite technology but Satellites like Dish and direct TV do not fall under the pervue of DIVCA. In communities where they have rolled out cable (they prefer the term "advanced TV") they have used a sub-standard version called "U-Verse" where the Public Access channel is effectively burried under an iternet web-browser as opposed to taking its rightful place (channel 26) on the dial as we are used to.
 
Comcast has not yet met the terms of its DIVCA requirements to P.E.G. (Public, Education and Government Access) and appears to be taking a different approach in different markets. For instance, in Monterrey they have indicated that the cty may only use P.E.G. monies for "Capital" (start-up) expenses. This means the city is unable to operate its Cable channels as most expenses for an PEG channel are "operating", not capital...or start up expenses.
 
Thus far, Comcast is treating Pacifica as they have under the terms of the old city-wide agreement. It remains to be seen how the new DIVCA law will play-out with Comcast though we are certainly hoping for the best.
 
Further updates to follow...